PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Nov 14, 2017
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Honors: (1) the work and public service of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, and (2) the legacy of Congressman Leo J. Ryan and the bravery of Congressman Ryan and his team members for undertaking a dangerous fact-finding mission in Guyana.
Extends condolences to those affected by the mass shooting in Tucson, Arizona, on January 8, 2011, and by the tragedy in Jonestown, Guyana, on November 18, 1978.
Designates the Democratic Cloakroom in the Hall of the House of Representatives in the U.S. Capitol as the "Gabrielle Giffords-Leo J. Ryan Cloakroom."
People & committees
Rep. Speier, Jackie [D-CA-14] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H9199-9200)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H9199-9200)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H9199-9200)
Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.
Committee on Foreign Affairs discharged.
Committee on House Administration discharged.
Committee on House Administration discharged.
Committee on Transportation discharged.
Committee on Transportation discharged.
Mr. Shuster asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on House Administration, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.615 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.615 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.615 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.615 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.