Requesting return of official papers on H.R. 5.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 27, 2012

Directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to request the Senate to return to the House H.R. 5 (Protecting Access to Healthcare Act).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-8] · R–FL

Committees

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Mar 27, 2012
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Mar 27, 2012
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H1593)
Mar 27, 2012
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H1593)
Mar 27, 2012
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1593)
Mar 27, 2012
Introduced in House
Mar 27, 2012
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Engrossed in House · Mar 27, 2012 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 5 · Protecting Access to Healthcare Act

Source last updated: Feb 24, 2019. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.596 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.596, 112th Congress: Requesting return of official papers on H.R. 5.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-resolution/596

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2012-03-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hres596/BILLS-112hres596eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2019-02-24T03:39:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.596 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.596 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.596, 112th Congress: Requesting return of official papers on H.R. 5.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-resolution/596

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2012-03-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hres596/BILLS-112hres596eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2019-02-24T03:39:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.596 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.596 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.596, 112th Congress: Requesting return of official papers on H.R. 5.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-resolution/596

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2012-03-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hres596/BILLS-112hres596eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2019-02-24T03:39:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.596 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.596 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.596, 112th Congress: Requesting return of official papers on H.R. 5.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-resolution/596

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 2012-03-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hres596/BILLS-112hres596eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2019-02-24T03:39:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.596 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.