PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 53 · Passed House · Jul 13, 2023
This resolution sets forth the rule for further consideration of H.R. 2670 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, which authorizes appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Defense programs and activities; military construction; the national security programs of the Department of Energy; the Maritime Administration; the Defense Nuclear Safety Board; and the Naval Petroleum Reserves).
People & committees
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4] · R–OK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 296). (text: CR H3495)
House roll call 296 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 220 - 208 (Roll no. 296). (text: CR H3495)
House roll call 296 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 207 (Roll no. 295).
House roll call 295 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3501-3503)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 583, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 583.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3495-3501)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 29.
The resolution provides for further consideration of H. R. 2670 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order only those further amendments printed in House Report 118-142. One motion to recommit provided.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-142, by Mr. Cole.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-142, by Mr. Cole.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.583 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.583 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.583 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.583 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.