Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other purposes.

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 247.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 7, 1994

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 1348 (establishing the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor, Connecticut).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Moakley, John Joseph [D-MA-9] · D–MA

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 7, 1994
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 247.
Oct 7, 1994
Rule provides for consideration of Senate amendment to H.R. 1348. The Senate amendment and the motion to concur shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour. The previous question shall be ordered without intervening motion.
Oct 7, 1994
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-846, by Mr. Moakley.
Oct 7, 1994
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-846, by Mr. Moakley.
Oct 7, 1994
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Oct 7, 1994 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1348 · Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.575 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.575, 103rd Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/575

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1994-10-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres575/BILLS-103hres575rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.575 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.575 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.575, 103rd Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/575

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1994-10-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres575/BILLS-103hres575rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.575 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.575 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.575, 103rd Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/575

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1994-10-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres575/BILLS-103hres575rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.575 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.575 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.575, 103rd Congress: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/575

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1994-10-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres575/BILLS-103hres575rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.575 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.