PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
No official summary is available in the imported record yet.
People & committees
Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5] · R–NC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 189).
House roll call 189 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 189).
House roll call 189 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 566.
On consideration of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 211 (Roll no. 186).
House roll call 186 · Individual votesMr. McGovern moved On consideration of the resolution.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 566 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 566. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3039-3059; text: CR H3040)
By direction of the Committee on Rules, Ms. Foxx called up H.Res. 566 and asked for its immediate consideration.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 35.
The resolution makes in order a motion that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1 and provides for one hour of debate.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-179, by Ms. Foxx.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-179, by Ms. Foxx.
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.566 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.566 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.566 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.566 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.