PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 26, 2000
Waives points of order against consideration of the conference report on H.R. 4516 (legislative branch appropriations).
People & committees
Rep. Linder, John [R-GA-11] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 214 - 210, 1 Present (Roll no. 448). (text: CR H7143)
House roll call 448 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 214 - 210, 1 Present (Roll no. 448).(text: CR H7143)
House roll call 448 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7151-7152)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS ON H. RES. 565 - At the conclusion of debate on the resolution, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. A roll call vote was demanded and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the resolution until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 565.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H7143-7150)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 268.
Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 4516 with 1 hour of general debate. Waives points of order against the conference report and against its consideration.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-797, by Mr. Linder.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-797, by Mr. Linder.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.565 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.565 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.565 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.565 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.