PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 194 (Roll no. 170). (text: CR H3001)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 7, 2014
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 96) establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2015 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2016 through 2024, and providing for proceedings during the period from April 11, 2014, through April 25, 2014.
People & committees
Rep. Woodall, Rob [R-GA-7] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 194 (Roll no. 170). (text: CR H3001)
House roll call 170 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 194 (Roll no. 170).(text: CR H3001)
House roll call 170 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 190 (Roll no. 169). (consideration: CR H3021-3022)
House roll call 169 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3021-3023)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 544, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day. (consideration: CR H3014)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 544.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3001-3014)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 98.
The resolution provides that the Committee on Appropriations may, at any time before 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 17, 2014, file any privilege reports to accompany measures making appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-405, by Mr. Woodall.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-405, by Mr. Woodall.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.544 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.544 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.544 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.544 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.