PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.535 / 108th Congress

Expressing the concern and support of the House of Representatives for local elected officials under threat of assassination, kidnapping, forcible displacement, and coercion by terrorist organizations in the Republic of Colombia.

Committee Agreed to Seek Consideration Under Suspension of the Rules, (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 25, 2004

States that the House of Representatives: (1) condemns all terrorist organizations in the Republic of Colombia for their efforts to undermine and remove local government officials through assassination, kidnapping, coercion, or forcible displacement; (2) expresses its strong support for democratically-elected municipal council members' efforts to continue governing in the face of continuing and increasing terrorist threats; (3) calls upon the Government of Colombia to continue its campaign to restore legitimate governance throughout the country; and (4) commends the efforts by the National Federation of Council Members of Colombia to support local elected officials' struggle against lawlessness and terror.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Weller, Jerry [R-IL-11] · R–IL

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Committee Agreed to Seek Consideration Under Suspension of the Rules, (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.535 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.535 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.535 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.535 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources