PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Jun 11, 2009
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Condemns the violent attack on the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum on June 10, 2009.
Honors the bravery and dedication of the employees and security personnel at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Offers condolences to the family of Officer Stephen Tyrone Johns who was killed in the line of duty.
Urges Americans to join the House of Representatives in condemning this act of hateful violence and intolerance.
People & committees
Rep. Klein, Ron [D-FL-22] · D–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 413 - 0 (Roll no. 334). (text: CR H6585)
House roll call 334 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 413 - 0 (Roll no. 334).(text: CR H6585)
House roll call 334 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 529.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6585-6593)
Mr. Rahall moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Berman asked unanimous consent that the Speaker be authorized on this legislative day to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules relating to House Resolution 529. Agreed to without objection.
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.529 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.529 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.529 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.529 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.