PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 53 · Passed House · Jun 21, 2023
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of
H.R. 3564 (Middle Class Borrower Protection Act of 2023, which rolls back changes made by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to certain fees, namely loan-level pricing adjustments, charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for a conventional single-family mortgage and restricts future fee adjustments),
H.R. 3799 (Custom Health Option and Individual Care Expense Arrangement Act or the CHOICE Arrangement Act, which provides statutory authority for regulations that allow employers to offer individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements), and
H. Res. 461 (which condemns using the facilities of a public elementary or secondary school that serves students to provide shelter for non-U.S. nationals who are not admitted into the United States).
People & committees
Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26] · R–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 215 - 211 (Roll no. 275). (text: CR H3003)
House roll call 275 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 215 - 211 (Roll no. 275). (text: CR H3003)
House roll call 275 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 207 (Roll no. 274).
House roll call 274 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3011-3013)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 524, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 524.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3003-3011)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 26.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3564 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H.R. 3799 under a structured rule with eighty minutes of general debate; and H.Res. 461, under a closed rule with one hour of general debate. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 3564 and H.R. 3799.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-115, by Mr. Burgess.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-115, by Mr. Burgess.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.524 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.524 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.524 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.524 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.