PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 17, 2025
This resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2913, the Ukraine Support Act. It also provides that the Clerk of the House shall transmit to the Senate a message that the House has passed H.R. 2913 no later than one week after the bill's passage.
People & committees
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 204 (Roll no. 206).
House roll call 206 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 204 (Roll no. 206).
House roll call 206 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3876-3877)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 518, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Meeks demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 518.
Considered from the Discharge Calendar. (consideration: CR H3813-3814; text: CR H3814)
Consideration initiated from the Discharge Calendar.
On motion to discharge Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 204 (Roll no. 200).
House roll call 200 · Individual votesMr. Meeks moved to discharge.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Meeks motion to discharge.
MOTION TO DISCHARGE COMMITTEE - Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XV, Mr. Meeks called up motion No. 6, to discharge the Committee on Rules from further consideration of H. Res. 518. (consideration: CR H3813)
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO DISCHARGE - Mr. Meeks notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to discharge the Committee on Rules from further consideration of H. Res. 518 pursuant to clause 2(c) of rule XV.
Motion to discharge the Committee on Rules filed by Mr. Meeks. Assigned to the Discharge Calendar, Calendar No. 6.
Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Meeks. Petition No: 119-8. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2025071708">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Submitted in House
Submitted in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.518 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.518 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.518 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.518 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.