Adopting rules for the One Hundred Sixth Congress in recodified form.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 6, 1999
Provides for the adoption of the Rules of the House of Representatives of the 105th Congress as the Rules of the House for the 106th Congress with amendments and other orders as outlined in this resolution.(Sec. 2) Requires: (1) the chairman of the Committee on the Budget, when elected and pending the adoption by the Congress of a concurrent resolution on the budget for FY 1999, to publish in the Congressional Record budget totals and allocations contemplated by the Congressional Budget Act (the Act) for FY 1999 through 2003; (2) such totals and levels to be effective in the House as though established under a concurrent resolution on the budget and provisions of the Act; and (3) the published totals and levels to be considered as the completion of congressional action on a concurrent resolution on the budget for FY 1999.Provides that, pending the adoption by the Congress of a concurrent resolution on the budget for FY 2000, a provision in a bill or joint resolution, or in an amendment thereto or a conference report thereon, that establishes prospectively for a Federal office or position a specified or minimum level of compensation to be funded by annual discretionary appropriations shall not be considered as providing new entitlement authority within the meaning of the Act.Determines a point of order under the Act, in the case of a reported bill or joint resolution considered pursuant to a special order of business, on the basis of the text made in order as an original bill or joint resolution for the purpose of amendment or to the text on which the previous question is ordered directly to passage, as the case may be.Bans the tenure limitation on the Committee on the Budget during the 106th Congress.Reaffirms for the 106th Congress each provision of House Resolution 168, 105th Congress, that was not executed as a change in the standing rules.Prohibits the Committee on Government Reform from having more than eight subcommittees during the 106th Congress.Permits the Majority and Minority Leaders, upon the adoption of this resolution, to submit for inclusion in the Congressional Record as part of the debate hereon such extraneous and tabular matter as they may consider to constitute legislative history concerning the codification of the standing rules.Allows the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China (solely for the purpose of completing activities directly associated with the declassification and public release of its report) to sit and act during the 106th Congress at any time before April 1, 1999, as it may deem appropriate, without regard to whether or not the House of Representatives is in session at the time. Continues the powers and jurisdiction of the Committee solely for such purpose, with specified exceptions.Provides for the disposition of the Committee's records, upon its termination.Limits funds for the Committee's activities to those that remain unobligated and unexpended as of the end of the 105th Congress.Requires, in the 106th Congress, the first ten numbers for bills (H.R. 1 through H.R. 10) to be reserved for assignments by the Speaker of the House to such bills as he may designate when introduced before March 1, 1999.Makes it in order to consider in the House a resolution amending rule XXVI (limitations on outside earned income and acceptance of gifts), if offered by the Majority Leader.
The previous question on the motion to commit with instructions was ordered without objection.
COMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS - The instructions contained in the motion to commit require the resolution to be committed to a select committee comprised of the majority leader and the minority leader and to be reported back immediately with amendments which set new ratios for membership on standing committees and which insert a "pay-as-you-go" provision for budget purposes pending the actuarial soundness of the Social Security Trust Fund.
Mr. Moakley moved to commit with instructions to a select committee.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 207 (Roll no. 3).
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.5 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.5 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.5 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.5 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.