Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3893) to expedite the construction of new refining capacity in the United States, to provide reliable and affordable energy for the American people, and for other purposes.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Oct 7, 2005
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 3893 (Gasoline for America's Security Act of 2005).
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H8748)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 481.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H8739-8749)
CORRECTION OF FILED COPY - Prior to the consideration of H. Res. 481, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart asked unanimous consent that the resolution be considered as amended by striking the number "3983" and inserting in lieu thereof "3893". Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H8739)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 100.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3893 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 109-245, by Mr. Diaz-Balart, L..
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 109-245, by Mr. Diaz-Balart, L..
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.481 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.481 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.481 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.481 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.