Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 43) to amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Laid on the table. See H. Res. 43 for further action. (consideration: CR H906)

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 27, 1995

Provides for the consideration of H. Res. 43 (permitting committee chairmen to announce and schedule hearings).

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22] · R–NY

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jan 31, 1995
Laid on the table. See H. Res. 43 for further action. (consideration: CR H906)
Jan 27, 1995
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 5.
Jan 27, 1995
Rule provides for consideration of H. Res. 43 with 1 hour of general debate. The resolution provides for the consideration of H. Res. 43 in the Committee of the Whole under an open rule. Bill is open to amendments.
Jan 27, 1995
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-6, by Mr. Solomon.
Jan 27, 1995
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-6, by Mr. Solomon.
Jan 27, 1995
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Jan 27, 1995 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HRES 43 · To amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.47 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.47, 104th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 43) to amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-resolution/47

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1995-01-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hres47/BILLS-104hres47rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.47 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.47 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.47, 104th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 43) to amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-resolution/47

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1995-01-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hres47/BILLS-104hres47rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.47 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.47 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.47, 104th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 43) to amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-resolution/47

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1995-01-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hres47/BILLS-104hres47rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.47 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.47 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.47, 104th Congress: Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 43) to amend clause 2(g)(3) of House Rule XI to permit committee chairmen to schedule hearings.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-resolution/47

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 1995-01-27.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hres47/BILLS-104hres47rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.47 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.