PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, H. Res. 463 motion to reconsider is laid on the table.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 5, 2023
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 277) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 288) to amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1615) to prohibit the use of Federal funds to ban gas stoves; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1640) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products.
People & committees
Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] · R–KY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 495, H. Res. 463 motion to reconsider is laid on the table.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on the motion to reconsider and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Mr. Scalise moved to reconsider.
On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 206 - 220 (Roll no. 248).
House roll call 248 · Individual votesFailed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 206 - 220 (Roll no. 248).
House roll call 248 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 203 (Roll no. 247).
House roll call 247 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2758-2760)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 463, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question on the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Scanlon demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 463.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2750-2758; text: CR H2750-2751)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 23.
The resolution provides for consideration of H. R. 277 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 288 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; H. R. 1615 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate; and H. R. 1640 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate. One motion to recommit on each measure.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-102, by Mr. Massie.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-102, by Mr. Massie.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.463 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.463 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.463 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.463 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.