PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Nov 21, 2003
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Waives a specified requirement of rule XIII with respect to a reported resolution providing for consideration or disposition of a bill or joint resolution making: (1) further continuing appropriations for FY 2004, or any amendment thereto; or (2) general appropriations for such fiscal year, any amendment thereto, or any conference report thereon.
People & committees
Rep. Linder, John [R-GA-7] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 224 - 203 (Roll no. 662). (text: CR H12181)
House roll call 662 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 224 - 203 (Roll no. 662).(text: CR H12181)
House roll call 662 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - 202 (Roll no. 661). (consideration: CR H12185-12186, H12225-12226; text: CR H12185)
House roll call 661 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H12225-12226)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 458, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frost demanded the yeas and nays and pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. Res. 458.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 458.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H12181-12186)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 134.
Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules: (1) a bill or joint resolution making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2004 or any amendment thereto; (2) a bill or joint resolution making general appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, any amendment thereto, or any conference report thereon.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 108-389, by Mr. Linder.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 108-389, by Mr. Linder.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.458 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.458 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.458 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.458 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.