PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.443 / 103rd Congress

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4426) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 25, 1994

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 4426 (making FY 1995 appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hall, Tony P. [D-OH-3] · D–OH

Committees

  • Rules Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    2. On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 244 - 181 (Roll no. 203).

      House roll call 203 · Individual votes
    3. Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 244 - 181 (Roll no. 203).

      House roll call 203 · Individual votes
    4. On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 191 (Roll no. 202).

      House roll call 202 · Individual votes
    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    6. Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4022-4032)

    7. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 169.

    8. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-530, by Mr. Hall (OH).

    9. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-530, by Mr. Hall (OH).

    10. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4426 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Waiving all points of order against the bill and against its consideration. Measure will be read by section. Specified amendments are in order. After general debate, the pending question shall be the adoption of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Appropriations now printed in the bill. The amendment shall be debatable for 10 minutes. All points of order against the amendment and against the bill, if amended, shall be waived. No further amendment to the bill shall be in order except as specified by the report accompanying this resolution, and debatable as specified. All points of order against said amendments shall be waived. The chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone a request for a recorded vote on any amendme...

    11. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.Res.443 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.Res.443 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.Res.443 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.Res.443 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources