PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Klug notified the House formally of his intention to call up the privileged resolution, H. Res. 436, on either Wednesday, June 8, 1994, or Thursday, June 9, 1994. Mr. Klug further asked unanimous consent that the text of the resolution be printed in the Congressional Record of today as if read. Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 24, 1994
Instructs the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to: (1) immediately investigate any alleged violation by any Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives of the Code of Official Conduct or of any other standard of conduct that is related to activities described by, or referred to in, documents that it received on July 22, 1992, from the Committee on House Administration pertaining to the Committee's Task Force to Investigate the Operation and Management of the House Post Office investigation; (2) report to the House periodically on the status of this investigation; and (3) report to the House by September 30, 1994, on its findings of fact and recommendations on possible disciplinary actions.
People & committees
Rep. Klug, Scott L. [R-WI-2] · R–WI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Klug notified the House formally of his intention to call up the privileged resolution, H. Res. 436, on either Wednesday, June 8, 1994, or Thursday, June 9, 1994. Mr. Klug further asked unanimous consent that the text of the resolution be printed in the Congressional Record of today as if read. Agreed to without objection.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4143)
Pursuant to rule IX of the Rules of the House, Mr. Klug gave formal notice of his intention to call up H. Res. 436 as a privileged resolution within two legislative days.
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3956)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.436 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.436 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.436 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.436 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.