PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1015-1016)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 28, 2017
Calls for the U.S. government to:
use all available leverage to achieve lasting, comprehensive cease-fires in cases of conflict in Africa;
work with governments to facilitate disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of combatants;
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
use the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act to sanction individuals or entities responsible for initiating or prolonging conflict, endangering humanitarian aid workers, or preventing delivery of humanitarian aid;
apply all available weather and crop information to more accurately predict incipient drought and to determine the likelihood of famine in conflict areas;
collaborate with other donor nations to accelerate the provision of food, clean water, medicine, and shelter to those in need;
expand the prepositioning of aid commodities in safe zones close to the famine region;
provide assistance to farmers, herders, and fishermen; and
use cash transfers to more quickly provide food aid where local markets exist and to support the functioning of local markets.
Urges governments in affected African countries to:
establish effective cease-fires and use force thereafter only when government forces or facilities or civilians are under attack;
identify and take actions against individuals and entities that actively threaten peace and safety;
work with civil society to help end conflict at the grassroots level and effect reconciliation;
take specifed actions to promote the delivery of food, clean water, medicine, and shelter;
protect humanitarian aid workers; and
safeguard agricultural areas and farm personnel.
People & committees
Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4] · R–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1015-1016)
Referred to the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and International Organizations.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.421 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.421 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.421 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.421 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.