Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, and providing that rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption of that conference report.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 4, 1994

Waives points of order against the consideration of the conference report on H. Con. Res. 218 (setting forth the congressional budget for the Federal Government for FY 1995 through 1999).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Beilenson, Anthony C. [D-CA-24] · D–CA

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 5, 1994
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
May 5, 1994
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - 168 (Roll no. 160).
House roll call 160 · Individual votes
May 5, 1994
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - 168 (Roll no. 160).
House roll call 160 · Individual votes
May 5, 1994
The previous question was ordered without objection.
May 5, 1994
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
May 5, 1994
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3135-3143)
May 4, 1994
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 153.
May 4, 1994
Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H. Con. Res. 218 with 1 hour of general debate. Upon Adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider the conference report and all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration shall be waived. Rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption by the Congress of the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution.
May 4, 1994
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-494, by Mr. Beilenson.
May 4, 1994
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-494, by Mr. Beilenson.
May 4, 1994
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Engrossed in House · May 5, 1994 Formatted Text PDF
Reported in House · May 4, 1994 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HCONRES 218 · Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.418 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.418, 103rd Congress: Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, and providing that rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption of that conference report.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/418

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 1994-05-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres418/BILLS-103hres418eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.418 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.418 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.418, 103rd Congress: Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, and providing that rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption of that conference report.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/418

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 1994-05-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres418/BILLS-103hres418eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.418 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.418 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.418, 103rd Congress: Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, and providing that rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption of that conference report.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/418

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 1994-05-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres418/BILLS-103hres418eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.418 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.418 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.418, 103rd Congress: Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, and providing that rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption of that conference report.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/418

Text version to examine: Engrossed in House · 1994-05-05.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres418/BILLS-103hres418eh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T14:47:33Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.418 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.