PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.403 / 105th Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 10) to enhance competition in the financial services industry by providing a prudential framework for the affiliation of banks, securities firms, and other financial service providers, and for other purposes.

Laid on the table. (consideration: CR H1885)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 31, 1998

Sets forth the rule (modified closed) for the consideration of H.R. 10 (financial services industry affiliation).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22] · R–NY

Committees

  • Rules Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Laid on the table. (consideration: CR H1885)

    2. Mr. Solomon asked unanimous consent that H. Res. 403 be laid upon the Table. Agreed to without objection.

    3. Mr. Solomon withdrew the resolution from consideration. (consideration: CR H1831)

    4. DEBATE - The House resumed debate.

    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    6. Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1824-1831)

    7. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 165.

    8. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 10 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part 1 of the report accompanying this resolution. No amendment to the substitute shall be in order except those printed in part 2 of the report accompanying this resolution, if offered in the order and manner specified.

    9. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 105-474, by Mr. Solomon.

    10. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 105-474, by Mr. Solomon.

    11. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.Res.403 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.Res.403 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.Res.403 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.Res.403 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources