PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Executive Comment Received from State.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 17, 1994
Condemns the Hebron massacre. Extends condolences to the Palestinian people and the families of the victims. Expresses concern over Palestinian casualties inflicted by the Israeli military since the massacre. Urges: (1) all parties to the Middle East peace talks to return to the negotiating table and redouble their efforts to achieve peace; (2) the Israeli Government to take actions to guarantee the safety of the civilian populations in the West Bank and Gaza; (3) the President to support the efforts of the United Nations Security Council to guarantee their safety; and (4) the U.S. Government to become more actively engaged as a full partner in the peace process. Calls for an end to violence against all civilians in the region. Encourages the U.S. Government to: (1) investigate the financial and other connections between Israeli terrorist groups opposed to the peace process and their supporters in the United States to determine whether any U.S. laws have been violated; and (2) prosecute any such violations.
People & committees
Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-3] · D–WV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Executive Comment Received from State.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.
Executive Comment Requested from State.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.390 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.390 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.390 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.390 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.