Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - 204 (Roll no. 502). (text: CR H6021)

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 30, 2013

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-32] · R–TX

Committees

Rules Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 30, 2013
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - 204 (Roll no. 502). (text: CR H6021)
House roll call 502 · Individual votes
Sep 30, 2013
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sep 30, 2013
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 225 - 204 (Roll no. 502).(text: CR H6021)
House roll call 502 · Individual votes
Sep 30, 2013
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 198 (Roll no. 501). (consideration: CR H6029-6030)
House roll call 501 · Individual votes
Sep 30, 2013
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 367.
Sep 30, 2013
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6021-6030)
Sep 30, 2013
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
Sep 30, 2013
The resolution provides for a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House recede from its amendments and concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment printed in House Report 113-239.
Sep 30, 2013
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-239, by Mr. Sessions.
Sep 30, 2013
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-239, by Mr. Sessions.
Sep 30, 2013
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Sep 30, 2013 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Engrossed in House · Sep 30, 2013 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HJRES 59 · Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.367 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.367, 113th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/367

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2013-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hres367/BILLS-113hres367rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:13:23Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.367 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.367 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.367, 113th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/367

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2013-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hres367/BILLS-113hres367rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:13:23Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.367 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.367 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.367, 113th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/367

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2013-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hres367/BILLS-113hres367rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:13:23Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.367 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.367 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.367, 113th Congress: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 59) making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-resolution/367

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2013-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/113/bills/hres367/BILLS-113hres367rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:13:23Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.367 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.