PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 1996
Sets forth the modified closed rule for the consideration of H.R. 2854 (agricultural programs modification).
People & committees
Rep. Solomon, Gerald B. H. [R-NY-22] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 244 - 168 (Roll no. 32).
House roll call 32 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 244 - 168 (Roll no. 32).
House roll call 32 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 228 - 182 (Roll no. 31).
House roll call 31 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1403-1414)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 184.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2854 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill and provides for consideration in the Committee of the Whole. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Agriculture now printed in the bill. Allpoints of order against the committee substitute shall be waived. No amendment to the substitute shall be in order except those specified in the report accompanying this resolution and shall not be subject to further amendment. Said amendments shall be debated in the order and manner specified. All points of order against said amendments shall be waived. It shall be in order at any time for the Chairman of the...
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-463, by Mr. Solomon.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-463, by Mr. Solomon.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.366 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.366 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.366 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.366 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.