Providing that all House of Representatives meetings and hearings on health care legislation shall be open to the public, and expressing the sense of the House that the Senate and the Executive Branch should allow public access to the process of health care reform.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Information, Justice, Transportation and Agriculture.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 11, 1994
Requires all House of Representatives hearings and meetings at the subcommittee, full committee, and conference committee level regarding health care legislation to be open to the public and the media, except where disclosures would endanger the national security, violate a law or rule of the House, or tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person. Expresses the sense of the House that the Senate and the executive branch should guarantee public and media access to meetings and hearings concerning health care reform legislation.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 4, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.363 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.363 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.363 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.363 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.