PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 8, 1994
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 811 (reauthorizing the independent counsel law for an additional five years).
People & committees
Rep. Derrick, Butler C. [D-SC-3] · D–SC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 242 - 174 (Roll no. 17).
House roll call 17 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 242 - 174 (Roll no. 17).
House roll call 17 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 249 - 174 (Roll no. 16).
House roll call 16 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House resumed debate.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H366-377)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 133.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 811 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Providing for the consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole. Measure will be read by section. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Points of order against the committee amendment for failure to comply with provisions of the Budget Act shall be waived. Only those amendments printed in the report accompanying this resolution shall be in order, to be considered in the manner specified in the report and not subject to further amendment except as specified. All points of order against the amendments shall be waived. After passage of the bill, it shall be in ...
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-419, by Mr. Derrick.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-419, by Mr. Derrick.
Introduced in House
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E82)
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.352 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.352 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.352 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.352 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.