PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 20, 1999
Sets forth the rule (modified closed) for the consideration of H.R. 2300 (allowing a State to combine certain funds for the academic achievement of all its students).
People & committees
Rep. Pryce, Deborah [R-OH-15] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 201 (Roll no. 529).
House roll call 529 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 201 (Roll no. 529).
House roll call 529 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 338.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H10685-10689)
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2300 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. makes in order the Committee on Education and the Workforce amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill as an original bill modified by the amendments printed in Part A of H. Rept. 106-408. Makes in order only those amendments printed in Part B of H. Rept. 106-408.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 138.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-408, by Ms. Pryce (OH).
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-408, by Ms. Pryce (OH).
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.338 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.338 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.338 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.338 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.