PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 1996
Provides that upon adoption of this resolution the House shall be considered to have taken from the Speaker's table H.R. 1643 (continuing appropriations) with the Senate amendment and to have concurred therein.
People & committees
Rep. Gephardt, Richard A. [D-MO-3] · D–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Motion to appeal the ruling of the chair tabled.
On motion to table the motion to appeal the ruling of the chair Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 206 - 167, 1 Present (Roll No. 2).
House roll call 2 · Individual votesMr. Armey moved to table the motion to appeal the ruling of the chair
Mr. Moran appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the chair.
The Chair ruled that the resolution did not constitute a question of the privileges of the House
The Chair recognized Members on the question of whether the resolution constituted a question of the privileges of the House.
Considered as a question of privilege.
Consideration initiated as a question of privilege.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.328 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.328 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.328 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.328 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.