PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 53 · Passed House · Apr 26, 2023
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of
H.R. 2811 (Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023, which increases the federal debt limit, decreases spending, repeals several energy tax credits, expands work requirements for some means-tested programs, and nullifies regulations for canceling federal student loan debt), and
H.J. Res. 39 (which nullifies a rule submitted by the Department of Commerce that allows for the suspension of duties on certain solar panels that are completed in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand or Vietnam and use certain Chinese parts and components).
People & committees
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4] · R–OK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 219 - 210 (Roll no. 196). (text: CR H1960)
House roll call 196 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 219 - 210 (Roll no. 196). (text: CR H1960)
House roll call 196 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 210 (Roll no. 195).
House roll call 195 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. H. Res. 327 - "Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2811) to provide for a responsible increase to the debt ceiling, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 39) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to "Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414"." (consideration: CR H1977-1978)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 327, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question on the resolution, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 327.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1960-1977)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 14.
Resolution provides for two hours of general debate on H.R. 2811 and one hour of general debate on H.J. Res. 39. The previous question is considered as ordered with one motion to recommit allowed on each measure.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-43, by Mr. Cole.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-43, by Mr. Cole.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.327 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.327 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.327 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.327 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.