PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Jul 9, 2003
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2211 (reauthorization of title II (Teacher Quality Enhancement) of the Higher Education Act of 1965).
People & committees
Rep. Myrick, Sue Wilkins [R-NC-9] · R–NC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 252 - 170 (Roll no. 338). (text: CR H6353)
House roll call 338 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 252 - 170 (Roll no. 338).(text: CR H6353)
House roll call 338 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6363-6364)
POSTPONED VOTE - The Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern asked for the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 310.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6353-6356)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 77.
Provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule. Makes in order only those amendments printed in House Report 108-190. Provides that the amendments printed in the report shall be considered only in the order printed, offered only by a Member designated in the report, considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified, equally divided and controlled, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand fora division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. Waives all points of order against the amendments printed
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 108-190, by Mrs. Myrick.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 108-190, by Mrs. Myrick.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.310 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.310 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.310 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.310 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.