PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Bonior. Petition No: 106-6. (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/106/lrc/pd/Petitions/Dis6.htm">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 23, 1999
Sets forth the rule (open) for the consideration of H.R. 325 (Federal minimum wage increase).Prohibits the Clerk of the House of Representatives from preparing the engrossment of H.R. 325 until the 30th calendar day following its passage. Provides that if, before such day, the House has passed a bill introduced by Representative Charles B. Rangel and Representative John S. Tanner relating to tax relief for small businesses, then the Clerk shall immediately prepare the engrossment.Directs the Clerk upon the passage of such bill within the described period, in the engrossment of H.R. 325, to: (1) add the text of the bill at the end of H.R. 325; and (2) make appropriate conforming changes.
People & committees
Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Bonior. Petition No: 106-6. (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/106/lrc/pd/Petitions/Dis6.htm">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.301 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.301 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.301 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.301 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.