Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the situation in Burundi.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Africa.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 4, 1993

Condemns the attempted coup d'etat in Burundi and the murder of President Ndadaye and his cabinet ministers. Calls for the installation of the democratically elected government in Burundi. Commends: (1) the people of Burundi for their commitment to democracy; and (2) the Clinton administration and the international community for the prompt condemnation of the October 21, 1993, attempted coup. Urges: (1) the people of Burundi to help end the ethnic violence; (2) the military authorities to restore law and order and hand over power to the democratically elected civilian government; (3) the Organization of African Unity (OAU) to assist in restoring democracy and ending the ethnic stife in Burundi; and (4) the international community to assist the OAU in such efforts and to provide humanitarian assistance to the people of Burundi. Encourages the people of Burundi to continue their commitment to ethnic reconciliation and democracy.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Johnston, Harry [D-FL-19] · D–FL

Committees

Foreign Affairs Committee

5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Nov 17, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Africa.
Nov 4, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Nov 4, 1993
Introduced in House
Nov 4, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Nov 4, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.294 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.294, 103rd Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the situation in Burundi.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/294

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-11-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres294/BILLS-103hres294ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T11:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.294 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.294 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.294, 103rd Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the situation in Burundi.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/294

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-11-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres294/BILLS-103hres294ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T11:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.294 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.294 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.294, 103rd Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the situation in Burundi.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/294

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-11-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres294/BILLS-103hres294ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T11:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.294 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.294 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.294, 103rd Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the situation in Burundi.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-resolution/294

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-11-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hres294/BILLS-103hres294ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T11:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.294 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.