PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 6, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2739 (authorizing appropriations under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982).
People & committees
Rep. Moakley, John Joseph [D-MA-9] · D–MA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H7573-7575)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 97.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2739 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of four titles as follows: 1. Titles I and II, consisting of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Public Works now printed in the bill; 2. a title III, consisting of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science, Space and Technology now printed in the bill H.R. 2820; 3. a title IV, consisting of an amendment printed in the report accompanying this resolution. Measure will be read by title. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment affecting the subject matter of title IV of the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in o...
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-277, by Mr. Moakley.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-277, by Mr. Moakley.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.269 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.269 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.269 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.269 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.