PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 29, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 3167 (extending emergency unemployment compensation and establishing worker profiling).
People & committees
Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 239 - 150 (Roll no. 507).
House roll call 507 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 239 - 150 (Roll no. 507).
House roll call 507 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8004-8005)
The previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H7873-7880)
CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION - Mr. Dreier announced his intention to call up H. Res. 265 on October 15, 1993, pursuant to the provisions of clause 1(c) of rule XXVIII.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 95.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3167 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the bill, modified by the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-269, by Mr. Bonior.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-269, by Mr. Bonior.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.265 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.265 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.265 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.265 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.