PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 28, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 1845 (establishment of the Biological Survey in the Department of the Interior).
People & committees
Rep. Hall, Tony P. [D-OH-3] · D–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 238 - 188 (Roll no. 483).
House roll call 483 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 238 - 188 (Roll no. 483).
House roll call 483 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
MODIFICATION OF TEXT OF H. RES. 262 - Mr. Hall of Ohio asked unanimous consent that the text of H. Res. 262 be modified to reflect correction of a drafting error that inadvertantly allocated one hour of general debate on H.R. 1845 when the intent of the Committee on Rules had been to allocate one hour and fifteen minutes of general debate. Agreed to without objection.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H7468-7473)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 92.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1845 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. In lieu of the committee amendments now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-262, by Mr. Hall (OH).
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-262, by Mr. Hall (OH).
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.262 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.262 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.262 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.262 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.