PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.240 / 106th Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1660) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the incentives for the construction and renovation of public schools and to provide tax incentives for corporations to participate in cooperative agreements with public schools in distressed areas.

Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Rangel. Petition No: 106-5. (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/106/lrc/pd/Petitions/Dis5.htm">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 1, 1999

Sets forth the rule (closed) for the consideration of H.R. 1660 (public school modernization). Provides that if the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the House of Representatives shall, immediately after the third daily order of business, resolve into such Committee for further consideration of the bill.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15] · D–NY

Committees

  • Rules Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Rangel. Petition No: 106-5. (<a href="http://clerk.house.gov/106/lrc/pd/Petitions/Dis5.htm">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.Res.240 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.Res.240 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.Res.240 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.Res.240 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources