Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives congratulating President Pastrana and the people of Colombia for moving the peace process forward and calling on the government and all other parties to the current conflict in Colombia to end the guerrilla and paramilitary violence which continues to pose a serious threat to democracy as well as economic and social stability in Colombia.

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 19, 1999

Congratulates: (1) the people of Colombia for their continued demonstration of support for the democratic process as well as for an end to the internal conflict; and (2) President Andres Pastrana for his strong commitment to seek an end to the guerilla and paramilitary violence in Colombia and for his initiatives to begin a peace process. Urges: (1) Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia and National Liberation Army guerrilla leaders, and the leaders of the paramilitary groups, to end the violence, sever their relationships with the narcotics trade, and negotiate a peace accord with the Colombian Government which would provide lasting peace, reaffirm democratic principles, and end the cultivation, production, and trade of narcotics; and (2) the international community to play a more proactive role in trying to resolve the internal conflict by encouraging all sides to participate in the peace process. Reaffirms U.S. support for the peace process. Commits the United States to assist the Colombian Government in finding a peaceful resolution and to continue U.S. assistance to help strengthen political stability, foster economic growth, and combat the drug trade within Colombia.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-23] · R–CA

Committees

Foreign Affairs Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Feb 16, 1999
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere.
Jan 19, 1999
Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Jan 19, 1999
Introduced in House
Jan 19, 1999
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jan 19, 1999 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.24 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.24, 106th Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives congratulating President Pastrana and the people of Colombia for moving the peace process forward and calling on the government and all other parties to the current conflict in Colombia to end the guerrilla and paramilitary violence which continues to pose a serious threat to democracy as well as economic and social stability in Colombia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/24

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1999-01-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres24/BILLS-106hres24ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-23T13:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.24 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.24 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.24, 106th Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives congratulating President Pastrana and the people of Colombia for moving the peace process forward and calling on the government and all other parties to the current conflict in Colombia to end the guerrilla and paramilitary violence which continues to pose a serious threat to democracy as well as economic and social stability in Colombia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/24

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1999-01-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres24/BILLS-106hres24ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-23T13:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.24 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.24 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.24, 106th Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives congratulating President Pastrana and the people of Colombia for moving the peace process forward and calling on the government and all other parties to the current conflict in Colombia to end the guerrilla and paramilitary violence which continues to pose a serious threat to democracy as well as economic and social stability in Colombia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/24

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1999-01-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres24/BILLS-106hres24ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-23T13:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.24 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.24 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.24, 106th Congress: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives congratulating President Pastrana and the people of Colombia for moving the peace process forward and calling on the government and all other parties to the current conflict in Colombia to end the guerrilla and paramilitary violence which continues to pose a serious threat to democracy as well as economic and social stability in Colombia.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-resolution/24

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1999-01-19.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/106/bills/hres24/BILLS-106hres24ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-23T13:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.24 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.