Amending rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit the employing office of an employee of the House who serves in a reserve component of the uniformed services to pay the employee an additional salary for any period during which the employee is on active duty.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Technology and the House.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 7, 2003
Amends the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit the employing office of any employee who serves on active duty (other than for training) as a member of the reserves with respect to any pay period during the 108th Congress to pay additional compensation to the employee for that pay period, as long as the additional compensation does not exceed the difference between the amount paid to the employee by the employing office for the most recent pay period before such active duty and the amount paid to the employee as a member for that pay period.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.223 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.223 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.223 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.223 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.