PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.For Further Action See H.Res.226.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 23, 1999
Resolves that the House of Representatives: (1) condemns the attacks against three Jewish places of worship in the Sacramento, California, area on June 18, 1999; (2) commends the citizens from California and across the country who have provided moral support to Sacramento's Jewish community and who have offered money, labor, books, and other materials to help rebuild the three synagogues; (3) supports all Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies' efforts to bring the perpetrators of these attacks to justice; and (4) reaffirms its commitment to a society that fully respects and protects all places of worship and reaffirms the right of individuals of all religious convictions freely to practice their religion.
People & committees
Rep. Lantos, Tom [D-CA-12] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
For Further Action See H.Res.226.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.219 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.219 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.219 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.219 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.