PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 415 - 0 (Roll no. 94). (text: CR H1807-1808)
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Apr 6, 2005
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Honors the life and work of Pope John Paul II. Expresses condolences to the people of Poland for the loss of such an inspirational figure in Poland's political transformation. Extends sympathy to Catholics around the world who looked to the Pope as Supreme Pontiff. Calls upon the people of the United States to reflect on the Pope's life during the worldwide period of remembrance following his death.
People & committees
Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6] · R–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 415 - 0 (Roll no. 94). (text: CR H1807-1808)
House roll call 94 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 415 - 0 (Roll no. 94).(text: CR H1807-1808)
House roll call 94 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 190.
Considered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H1807-1821)
Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 5, 2018. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.190 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.190 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.190 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.190 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.