Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2264) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 7 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1994.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 27, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 2264 (budget reconciliation).
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Point of order raised by Mr. Solomon on the content of the measure. The provisions of the resolution have the effect of changing the Rules of the House and as such the resolution is subject to a point of order. Point of order overruled by the Chair.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2952-2970)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 46.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2264 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Upon adoption of this resolution the Speaker may declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole for consideration of the bill, pursuant to section 7 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fy 1994. The modifications to the bill printed in part 1 of the report accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against the bill, as modified, shall be waived. A specified amendment is in order. Only the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part 2 of the report accompanying this resolution shall be in order, if offered only by Representative Kasich or his designee, to be debatable for one hour and not subject to amendment. ...
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-112, by Mr. Derrick.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-112, by Mr. Derrick.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.186 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.186 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.186 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.186 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.