PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 10, 1995
Elects Representative Greg Laughlin to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
People & committees
Rep. Boehner, John A. [R-OH-8] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 162 (Roll no. 476).
House roll call 476 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 162 (Roll no. 476).
House roll call 476 · Individual votesOn motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 233 - 181 (Roll No. 475).
House roll call 475 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider the vote tabled.
Mr. Boehner moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote
Mr. Frank (MA) moved to reconsider the vote.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 179 (Roll no. 474).
House roll call 474 · Individual votesPOINT OF ORDER - Mr. Frank (MA) made a point of order that the remarks of Mr. Paxton during general debate on the resolution were not related to the subject of the resolution. The point of order was sustained.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Frank (MA) made a point of order that the remarks of Mr. Paxton during general debate on the resolution were not related to the subject of the resolution. The point of order was sustained.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Bonior made a point of order that the remarks of Mr. Haywood during general debate on the resolution were not related to the subject of the resolution. The point of order was sustained.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Boehner made a point of order that the remarks of Mr. Bonior during general debate on the resolution were not related to the subject of the resolution. The point of order was sustained.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. Boehner made a point of order that the remarks of Mr. Bonior during general debate on the resolution were not related to the subject of the resolution. The point of order was sustained.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 230 - 180 (Roll no. 473).
House roll call 473 · Individual votesMr. Boehner moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote
Mr. DeLay moved to reconsider the vote.
On motion to table the measure Failed by recorded vote: 178 - 229 (Roll no. 472). (consideration: CR H6716)
House roll call 472 · Individual votesMr. Watt (NC) moved to table the measure.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 179 (Roll no. 471).
House roll call 471 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider the vote tabled.
Mr. Boehner moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote
Mr. DeLay moved to reconsider the vote.
On motion to consider Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 176 (Roll no. 470). (consideration: CR H6715)
House roll call 470 · Individual votesMr. Doggett demanded the question of consideration.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6714-6723)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Oct 26, 2016. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.183 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.183 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.183 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.183 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.