PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 07 · Reported to House · Feb 27, 2023
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of
H.R. 347 (Reduce Exacerbated Inflation Negatively Impacting the Nation Act, which requires the Office of Management and Budget and the President's Council of Economic Advisors to provide an inflation estimate for each executive order that is projected to cause an annual gross budgetary or economic effect of at least $1 million), and
H.J. Res 30 (nullifies a Department of Labor rule that permits fiduciaries of employee benefit plans to consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance factors in investment decisions or when exercising shareholder rights).
People & committees
Rep. Burgess, Michael C. [R-TX-26] · R–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 205 (Roll No. 123). (text: CR H924)
House roll call 123 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 205 (Roll No. 123). (text: CR H924)
House roll call 123 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 201 (Roll no. 122).
House roll call 122 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H931-932)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 166, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 166.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H924-930)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 4.
Provides for consideration of H.R. 347 and H.J. Res. 30 and one hour of debate on each measure. The rule makes in order amendments to H.R. 347 printed in the report and provides for one motion to recommit on each measure.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-4, by Mr. Burgess.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-4, by Mr. Burgess.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.166 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.166 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.166 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.166 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.