Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 4, 1993
Establishes the Office of House Security, within the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, to be headed by a Director. Authorizes the office to develop, establish, and carry out policies and procedures relating to such matters as: (1) the handling of classified information addressed to the House, the Speaker, or Members and employees; (2) the processing of security clearance requests and renewals for House officers and employees; (3) maintaining a centralized record of security clearances held by such officers and employees and reducing the number of such clearances; (4) consulting and presenting briefings on security matters and the handling of classified information for Members and employees; (5) maintaining an active liaison on behalf of the House or any committee thereof with all Federal departments and agencies on security matters; and (6) conducting periodic review of the practices and procedures employed by all House offices for the handling of classified information. Requires the Director to develop a House Security Manual for distribution to all House offices. Authorizes the Office to: (1) provide appropriate facilities in the Capitol for House committee hearings at which restricted data or other classified information is to be discussed; and (2) operate a central repository in the Capitol for the safeguarding of classified information, including the classified records, transcripts, and materials of all closed sessions of the House. Makes this Act inapplicable to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Res.166 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Res.166 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Res.166 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Res.166 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.