PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 9, 2010
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1586) to modernize the air traffic control system, improve the safety, reliability, and availability of transportation by air in the United States, provide for modernization of the air traffic control system, reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration.
People & committees
Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-28] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 173 (Roll no. 517). (text: CR H6590)
House roll call 517 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 173 (Roll no. 517).(text: CR H6590)
House roll call 517 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6604)
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 244 - 164 (Roll no. 516). (consideration: CR H6597, H6603)
House roll call 516 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6603)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 1606, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dreier demanded the Yeas and Nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question on H.Res. 1606 until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1606.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6589-6597)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 231.
It shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill H.R. 1586 and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the Chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read and the motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-584, by Ms. Slaughter.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-584, by Ms. Slaughter.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1606 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1606 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1606 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1606 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.