PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 18, 2003
Declares that there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives, not more than specified amounts for certain committees of the House of Representatives in the 108th Congress. Sets forth first session and second session limitations. Allows the Committee on House Administration to adjust the total allowed for any of the named committees under specified circumstances.
People & committees
Rep. Ney, Robert W. [R-OH-18] · R–OH
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3822-3823)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H3822-3823)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 148.
Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H3821-3822, H3822-3827)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 35.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 108-91. (text of measure as reported in House: CR H3658)
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on House Administration. H. Rept. 108-91.(text of measure as reported in House: CR H3658)
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.148 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.148 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.148 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.148 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.