PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 15, 2001
Sets forth the rule (modified closed) for the consideration of H.R. 1836 (economic growth and tax relief reconciliation).
People & committees
Rep. Reynolds, Thomas M. [R-NY-27] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 207 (Roll no. 116). (text: CR H2204)
House roll call 116 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 207 (Roll no. 116).(text: CR H2204)
House roll call 116 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 142.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2204-2207)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 26.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1836 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Waives points of order against consideration. A specified amendment is in order. Provides for consideration of the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in H. Rept. 107-68, if offered by Representative Rangel or his designee, which shall be considered as read and separately debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled. Rule further provides that upon receipt of a message from the Senate transmitting H.R. 1836 with Senate amendments thereto, it shall be in order to consider in the House a motion offered by the Chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means or his designee that the House disagree to the Senate amendments and request or agree to a conference with the Senate thereon.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-68, by Mr. Reynolds.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 107-68, by Mr. Reynolds.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.142 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.142 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.142 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.142 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.