PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 30, 1993
Waives, with respect to any resolution reported by the Committee on Rules on March 31, 1993, to provide for the consideration of the conference report on H. Con. Res. 64 (congressional budget), provisions of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives that require a two-thirds vote to consider a report from such committee on the same day it is presented to the House.
People & committees
Rep. Beilenson, Anthony C. [D-CA-24] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 171 (Roll no. 124).
House roll call 124 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 248 - 171 (Roll no. 124).
House roll call 124 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1763-1768)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 24.
Upon adoption of this resolution, the requirement for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House shall be waived with respect to a resolution reported on the legislative day of March 31, 1993, providing for consideration of aa conference report to accompany H. Con. Res. 64.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-47, by Mr. Beilenson.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-47, by Mr. Beilenson.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.142 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.142 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.142 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.142 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.