PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 252 - 165 (Roll no. 92).
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 23, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 670 (public health services for pregnant women).
People & committees
Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-28] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 252 - 165 (Roll no. 92).
House roll call 92 · Individual votesMr. Moakley moved to table the motion to reconsider
Ms. Slaughter moved to reconsider the vote.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 169 (Roll no. 91).
House roll call 91 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 169 (Roll no. 91).
House roll call 91 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 252 - 164 (Roll no. 90).
House roll call 90 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1560-1568)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 23.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 670 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the report accomanying this resolution. Each amendment shall be offered in the order, manner, and debatable as specified in the report. Amendments shall not be subject to further amendment, except as specified. The amendment in the form of a motion to strike specified in the report, to be offered by Rep. Bartlett, shall not be in order if the text proposed to be stricken has been rewritten by a previous amendment. Upon adoption of this resolution, H. Res. 81 shall be laid upon the table.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-41, by Ms. Slaughter.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-41, by Ms. Slaughter.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.138 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.138 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.138 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.138 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.