Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Ray Epps.

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 147.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · Oct 14, 2022

This resolution requests President Biden, and directs Attorney General Garland, to transmit to the House of Representatives certain documents, records, or communications within their possession referring to Ray Epps.

Epps traveled to the District of Columbia to support President Trump on January 6, 2021, and was later the subject of allegations related to the Capitol riot.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-4] · R–AZ

Committees

Judiciary Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Gohmert, Louie [R-TX-1]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 14, 2022
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 147.
Oct 14, 2022
Reported adversely (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-544.
Oct 14, 2022
Reported adversely (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-544.
Sep 21, 2022
Ordered to be Reported Unfavorably (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 13.
Sep 21, 2022
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Sep 15, 2022
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sep 15, 2022
Introduced in House
Sep 15, 2022
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Oct 14, 2022 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Introduced in House · Sep 15, 2022 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.1356 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1356, 117th Congress: Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Ray Epps.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1356

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-10-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1356/BILLS-117hres1356rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:04:08Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.1356 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.1356 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1356, 117th Congress: Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Ray Epps.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1356

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-10-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1356/BILLS-117hres1356rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:04:08Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1356 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.1356 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1356, 117th Congress: Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Ray Epps.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1356

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-10-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1356/BILLS-117hres1356rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:04:08Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1356 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.1356 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1356, 117th Congress: Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Ray Epps.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1356

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-10-14.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1356/BILLS-117hres1356rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:04:08Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1356 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.